AquaSure scores site-level water risk for colocation and hyperscale facilities. Basin stress, drought exposure, hazard risk, and water use intensity, combined into a single 0-10 audit built on federal data, with every input traced back to its source.
Siting decisions used to belong to your development team. Now they involve a county commission, a state permitting office, and a hyperscale tenant's RFP questionnaire, and all three of them ask about water. Minnesota created a separate water permitting requirement for data centers. Denver passed a one-year moratorium on new data center zoning permits in May 2026. Most operators find out where a site really stands after the capital is already committed.
Not a dashboard login. A report.

A score you can't defend in a hearing is a score you can't use. That's why traceability is a deliverable and not a footnote.
| SOURCE | WHAT IT CONTRIBUTES | RESOLUTION |
|---|---|---|
| USGS | Water withdrawal and availability | County |
| NOAA | Drought frequency and severity | State |
| FEMA National Risk Index | Natural hazard exposure | County |
| WRI Aqueduct | Baseline basin water stress | State |
Resolution reflects current adapter coverage. County-level expansion is in progress.
A complete Phoenix, Arizona site audit with the full score breakdown, component weights, and the traceability matrix. Generated from live data, not a template.
Give us coordinates and an expected load profile and you will get back a full audit. The first site is free, so you can judge the output before anything else comes up.